They’re in ur government, legalizin’ ur gheys April 9, 2009
Posted by Matt Brown in Uncategorized.Tags: Gay Marriage, Humor, Politics, Religion
add a comment
I was sitting in Wendy’s two nights ago, trying to eat my chicken sandwich in piece, but the TV was distracting me. It was turned to MSNBC, and some commentator had a few talking heads on to discuss the recent developments in Iowa and Vermont, two states that recently made gay marriage legal. The commentator breathlessly said that “now is the time for a national discussion about gay marriage”.
You know what? I agree. But to save time, I’m just going to go ahead and do all the talking. Hope thats okay with you guys.
Q: These arrogant activist judges! Who do they think they are, striking down legislation that is clearly the will of the people?
A: Uh…maybe they think they’re judges? Isn’t that the entire concept of Judicial Review? Populists might clamor that this is elitist…and they’re right. Parts of our government were established to be a check on popular sentiment. If “just being popular” is enough of a reason for laws to escape judicial review, whats the point of having a judiciary? That “judicial activism” gave us Brown v Board of Education and Baker V Carr.
Plus, if we define “judicial activism” as “the supreme court voting to overturn a ruling”, then the Conservative wing is more likely to be activist. I’d like to suggest another definition of “Activist Judges”….”When judges make a decision that I disagree with”.
Seriously. How many people who are mad at the Iowa Supreme Court are basing their arguments on their knowledge of the Constitution of Iowa?
Q: Legalizing gay marriage and civil unions will doubtless start us on a slippery slope towards legalizing polygamy, pedophilia, animal marriages, and marrying Janet Reno.
A: I beg to differ. Animals and children cannot consent, so they cannot be married. Full stop. The United States doesn’t have the legal tradition of some place like Pakistan, where marrying off 11 year olds seems to be okay (and, oddly enough, Pakistan doesn’t allow gay marriage). Gay Marriage/Civil Unions, an agreement between two, consenting adults, is not analogous to any of the other aforementioned acts.
Polygamy may involve contenting parties (maybe, some sociological research on how relationships work on polygamous compounds might beg to differ), but its pretty easy to justify denying some legal benefits to multiple parties, as it would be easy to set up “families” as tax sheltering devices. The boondoggle dividing up benefits after a polygamous divorce might be a boon to lawyers, but it would be a huge hassle for our courts as well.
Besides, take it from a Mormon, polygamy ain’t worth it. Last time we tried that, mobs kidnapped and killed our leader, drove us from our perfectly good town in Illinois, drove us across the wilderness, and forced to settle in Utah. Gross. Where would the mobs send you if you tried to be polygamous now? Alaska, to live in Sarah Palin’s kingdom? (I can see this….polygamous families welcome in Alaska, so long as every child gets an assault rife, and has a stupid name. . Hi, these are my wives Kara, Lisa and Emily…and our children; Tuscaloosa, Microwave and Battlestar Galatica)
Q: I don’t want a gay marriage.
A: I am unaware of any judicial ruling or legislative act requiring anybody to get one.
Q: Allowing Gay Marriage will threaten the institution of marriage.
A: I hear this one a lot, and I have yet to really get a satisfactoy answer from anybody, be they commentator, ecclesiastical authority, or anybody else as to exactly why that is. Lets say that we believe that Marriage is a unique institution specifically created for a Man and a Woman, and that any other union should go by a different name. Okay, lets call the other one’s civil unions, and let them have the same benefits. Is that okay?
Many who oppose GM also oppose that idea, and I’m exactly sure why. Knowing that dudes are holding hands somewhere in San Fransisco doesn’t in any way cheapen or damage the wonderful (heterosexual) relationship I have now. When I’m out with my girlfriend…I’m not thinking about gay people. Like…ever. If you are, well…I’m no Dr.Phil, but I suspect your relationship may have other issues.
Is Marriage under attack? Sure, I believe that, but not by the gays. Divorce rates are high, and there are lots of possible culprits. Financial insecurity/worries have damaged lots of relationships. Pornography certainly has. Poor communication, infidelity, health problems….I can think of lots of things that might be contributing to marriages breaking down. *That* is a very important topic that we *should* have a national conversation about. The Nuclear Family is an institution worth defending.
But Gays? How often do you think this happens?
Honey, I know we’ve been married for 10 years, and I know we loved each other. But Iowa just legalized Gay Marriage, and I really think I should use that opportunity to take my Bro-mance with Chad to a new level. Before, it was just our weekly poker game and phone calls about fantasy baseball. Now….we can share Social Security. I just think its a better deal.
Really? I doubt it.
Q: Homosexuality is clearly a sin, and as such, we should oppose GM/CU
A: Personally, I think Theology doesn’t really enter into it. My own theological views on homosexuality are kind of moot as far as the debate over hospital visitation rights and pension sharing is concerned. My religious faith also teaches me to abstain from the consumption of alcohol and coffee, but it would be wrong to try and force that on everybody, no?
There is not a legal reason to think that allowing Civil Unions would require churches to marry gay people if they didn’t want to. Certainly, if there was, I would vigorously oppose it. Churches should have the freedom to marry/allow in whoever they want…but there is no credible reason to think that that would change. If somebody says otherwise in church, they are not speaking out of any understanding of the law.
At the end of the day, I may have my own theological belief about homosexuality, but why should that mean that gay people shouldn’t have hospital visitation rights?
Q: Thats about all I can think of.
A: Me too. Good talk.
Anger in the Age of Obama April 7, 2009
Posted by Matt Brown in Politics.Tags: Anger, Babies, Emotions, Obama, Poop, The Media
add a comment
It’s 2:04 PM and I can feel my brain turning to mush.
It isn’t the first time its happened, and I doubt it will be the last. I’m sitting here at my desk, searching through various news websites and blogs, trying to find something interesting to write about. I glance through the CNN Political Ticker, and I can feel my eyes start to glaze over as I scan the headlines for todays new manufactured political “crisis”. Omg, Obama farted at the G20. Sarkozy turned up his nose. Americans are outraged. Eric Cantor releases a statement on how Republicans would never embarrass our country like that, and it this flatulence incident just shows the glaring inexperience of our administration.
Below that are 6 other stories showing people getting outraged over tiny, mundane things. I switch over to gchat, where I’m talking with Maya, hoping that she’ll say something intelligent to break my mental lethargy. Instead, she describes, in graphic detail, her baby Miles’ latest poops. Now my head is full of political spin drivel, AND I know what a “four wiper” is. My eyes are bleeding.
Yes, I have a sneaking suspicion that I’m getting dumber, and I’m giving part of the blame to this newfangled internet news machine, which I’ve been so hooked up to, trying to mine article ideas.
From October to around February, the theme of the political news was “Hope”. It was the centerpiece of a winning political campaign, and it lurked in the background of several other issue debates. “We’re plotting a new direction”, we were told. “We’re going to erase the mistakes of the past, and we’re going to make history.” Political copy swelled with Hope, and I felt it burst into reality at the Obama Inauguration, where I felt like I was getting a big hug from a million formally oppressed liberals. Not only was it satisfying to get so recklessly emotionally involved with a cause, but writing was easy. I churned out thousands of words, and could have easily churned out thousands more if there was enough of a market.
But Hope no longer appears to be the dominant emotion in politics right now. It appears that Hope has given way to Anger.
Anger at politics and politicians is certainly nothing new. Would be politicos of my generation would do well to study Mark Twain and H.L Mencken to get a good historical perspective on government loathing. To me though, this anger is different…its broader, deeper, and profoundly personal.
The frustration seems to be pretty broad, and is popping up all over the place. People flip out over AIG bonuses, even though they represent tiny percentages of the stimulus bills. Folks are losing their jobs, their homes and their retirement plans. We can turn on the TV to see Lou Dobbs give himself a hernia while flipping out about Mexicans, and see Glenn Beck build a Chamber Of Fear bunker in Ruby Ridge and wait for the Second Coming. Add all of this up with the fact that quite a few people felt personally attacked by Obama’s very existence, and a culture of very unrealistic expectations, and we have the recipe for a smoldering vat of Anger.
Now, I’m just speculating here, but I think I might have an idea while some of that anger is so strong. Never in my short life have I felt the difference between generations this much. On one hand, we have an older generation who has held political, economic and cultural power for the last several decades…the Reagan Democrats, older working whites, etc. Their families might have moved out to the suburbs in the white flight era of the 1950s and 60s, and now the demographics of their neighborhoods are completely different. Their social values did not get passed down the following generation, and more socially progressive policies look to march on. The economy shifted from blue collar to high tech service, and they might have been left behind.
I’m not saying that feeling is totally unjustified or wrong, just my hypothesis.
Me? I’m not angry. I don’t have the capacity to stay angry at everything anymore…I get scandal fatigue. I pick a few pet issues to get all righteously indignant about (the achievement gap in American public schools, the growing anti-intellectualism of America, poor reporting, the fact that the Mike Brown still won’t hire a GM for the Cincinnati Bengals, those sorts of things), and then try to sift through the rest of the stories, separating the total crap from the important things that other, intelligent, passionate people will fight.
My little sister still gets angry at every injustice, and I have a few friends who still do. Bless their hearts. Others have totally unplugged themselves, washed their hands, and declared that the issues of the world are “somebody else’s problems”. I hope that as I continue to get older, I don’t lose my ability to get angry. Its important to get angry sometimes…it shows you still have passion, that you’re still paying attention.
But that anger needs to be channeled into productive sources, not trapped in a spin cycle of fear and loathing. If you’re upset about the way things are going, there are legitimate, proper cycles to go about changing things. Now is not the time for bunkers or fear chambers. To fall into that trap would end whatever hope and goodwill we might have accumulated, and put us all right back where we started.
I’d go on, but my gchat is flashing again, which means another “the baby pooped!” story….and my mind is back to mush.
New Website March 10, 2009
Posted by Matt Brown in Uncategorized.Tags: Teach For America, Website News
add a comment
For those of you that still read this….
I think one of the problems with this website has been its lack of focus. From now on, the focus of this website will be around political and funny stuff.
I reference Teach For America often here, and I’ve created a new website focusing just on those experiences. feel free to check it out HERE
www.somedayallblogs.wordpress.com
CSPAN THE MUSICAL-Volume I February 11, 2009
Posted by Matt Brown in Uncategorized.Tags: Economy, Humor, Obama, Politics
add a comment
resident Obama is sitting at his desk. His tie is loosened, and he is obviously stressed
OBAMA:
My first day in office certainly wasn’t that hard
The only hiccup was Roberts inability to read from a card
but now crisis are mounting, folks are beating down my door
this certainly wasn’t the change I had hoped for.
The media is pounding me, and I can’t relax
because nobody I hired paid all their taxes.
Then the economy descended into insanity,
and my idiot press sec said I’d grab beers with Sean Hannity
Hopefully my stimulus bill can get some momentum flowing
Lemme check CSPAN and see how thats going…
Cut to: PELOSI’S OFFICE
Nancy Pelosi is meeting with her staffers, and other high level Democratic House members. They are giddily throwing around monopoly money.
PELOSI:
When we asked for children’s insurance, they laughed in our face
but now I’m in charge, and we’ll put the GOP back in it’s place
to hell with bipartisanship, they didn’t show any here
so lets load this bill up with our wishlist from the last 8 years!
Guys? What are your problems?
INTERN
In a few months, me and my girlfriend are having a baby
and we’re worried about money, since you really don’t pay me
PELOSI: 300 MILLION FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD!!
AIDE
I’ve finally got some time off, but I don’t know what to do
since i’ve already watched everything in my Netflicks queue
PELOSI:
ANOTHER 600 MILLION FOR HOLLYWOOD!!
OTHER AIDE
Oh, I have something that requires me to vent
I hit a pothole driving to work, now my BMW has a dent!
PELOSI: (clearly drunk with power)
ELVENTY BILLION BUCKS TO BUILD NEW ROADS! Bwahaha
CUT TO: Republican Meeting
CANTOR: For 8 years we spent money like drunken fools
and hoped that nobody would notice, or read the news
now we’re hopelessly out of power, so its time to pretend
that we know anything about how to responsibly spend
BOEHNER: Let us make the most outlandish statements we can make on the floor!
Its easy to take a stand, when you don’t matter anymore!
Mike Huckabee: I sent out a letter to everybody on my mailing list
saying this bill is an abomination, and its making God pissed
Mitt Romney: I’m against this bill too! It’s certainly no fun
it gives no money at all to any company I run
Glenn Beck: LOOOOUD NOISES! I DONT KNOW WHAT WE’RE YELLING ABOUT!
(cut to: Obama, facepalming)
OBAMA: I thought my first 100 days were supposed to be a honeymoon?
If its all going to be just like this, I hope its 2012 soon….
Changing up V Day February 9, 2009
Posted by Matt Brown in Uncategorized.Tags: Humor, Ohio, Valentine's day
add a comment
I might catch some flack for this, but I really don’t like Valentine’s Day at all.
Now hear me out, this isn’t for any of the typical reasons. It isn’t because I’m some bitter single guy…I’m happily in a relationship, but I wasn’t bitter on Valentine Days past when I wasn’t. On the contrary, it allowed me to get all sorts of cheap candy the day or two after (and who doesn’t like cheap candy?)
It isn’t because I disprove of the materialism of the holiday either. So Hallmark and Buckeye Flowers get to make a few extra bucks over the weekend. We’re in a recession here people. Not only is it our obligation as boyfriends to buy stuff over Valentine’s day, its just flat out patriotic.
No, it isn’t the day itself that I have a problem with. It’s when we have it. There isn’t a worse possible time for a romantic holiday than in the middle of February, especially when you live in Central Ohio.
I mean, have any of you guys been outside these past few days? The sky has been gray for what seems like 13 consecutive days. The trees, grass, everything is barren and devoid of life. Its also cold, windy, and half of the sidewalks are still covered in ice. I’ve fallen down maybe a dozen times on the way to class these past few weeks. Sorry we couldn’t do dinner this weekend…I’m stuck at OSU hospital cause I broke my hip on Waldeck. Great.
Plus, this is the middle of flu season! Everybody has been battling that same case of the sniffles for about 6 weeks. When people are taking about sharing things with your loved ones, they typically aren’t talking about the flu. Some things are best kept to yourself.
It all seems like quite a predicament, but I’m a solutions orientated guy, and I have an idea. Why not just move Valentine’s Day to say, early June?
Everybody is in a much better mood in June. The sun comes back out, and we can all shake off our lingering Seasonal Affective Disorder. We aren’t sick anymore, and it’ll be warm enough to do things outside, creating more possibilities for fun Valentine’s Day activities. Plus, June isn’t a big holiday month. A quick Google search shows me that we have Father’s Day, Flag Day, and then a bunch of made up holidays in those first two weeks (national ballpoint pen day? Seriously? I bet we can squeeze Valentine’s Day in there somewhere). This works out better for everybody.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go down a shot of DayQuil. . I got make sure I’m healthy by this weekend.